Around the Iranian Religious Intellectualism, as one of the thought focuses in the Middle East, there are various definitions and descriptions and challenges. This dispute in definition, has made, the tastes and various tendencies, each other, have different, contradictory and uncertainties for Iranian Religious Intellectualism. In the ahead article, the main question will be that, how is the formation and Discourse Analysis of “Iranian Religious intellectualism” and what is this formation of similar intellectual currents in the Middle East? The answer to this question is followed by the help of the discourse analysis method (Laclau and Mouffe). In the way that, “discourse” is also used as a theoretical framework and as a tool and method for analysis to reach its goal, which is a comprehensive explanation and a relative consensus on the concept of Religious Intellectualism. The research hypothesis is based on which Religious Intellectualism discourse has been a fluid state and different item of discourse analysis like points, hegemony and his others, are fluctuating in continuous and altered articulation. This discourse also in proportion to the intellectual flows of the Middle East (with a slight distance) follow common and meaningful patterns. The main achievement of this article will be from providing a discursive and provisional model in recognizing the “Iranian Religious intellectualism” flow (As a minor item and elective of the reformation of religious thinking in the Middle East).